Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42525196›Full record

ArticleWiener medizinische Wochenschrift (1946)2026

[A letter on research in general practice].

Waltraud Fink, Gustav Kamenski

Abstract readEnglish Abstract
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Wiener medizinische Wochenschrift (1946), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Waltraud Fink, Straning 153, 3722, Straning-Grafenberg, Österreich. waltraud.fink@gmx.at.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5241-477X
Gustav Kamenski, Ollersbachgasse 144, 2261, Angern/March, Österreich.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A letter from the general practitioner and researcher Robert N. Braun to Heinz Schulze, dated December 28, 1964, offers insight into his early work. At its core is Braun's synopsis of 28 publications he had released up to that point. These were intended to be sent to physicians in Braunschweig, Germany to foster both understanding and interest in research into general practice.The correspondence provides an authentic perspective on Braun's extensive body of work. The cited publications mark the beginning of a scientific foundation for general practice as a medical discipline. They illustrate necessary stages and offer suggestions for further theoretical research in the field. To this end the papers were outlined into four thematic areas: A. The position of general practice within the broader field of medicine, B. A characterization of theoretical research in everyday practice in general, and C. concerning specific health conditions, finally D. Important steps for research in applied medicine. The letter is also a valuable resource for compiling a catalogue of Braun's works.

Indexed as

Early publications by RN BraunGeneral practice as a medical discipline of its ownResearch in general practice/primary medical care

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.