Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42525185›Full record

ReviewJournal of robotic surgery2026

Robotic adhesiolysis: current evidence, technical considerations, and future directions.

Bogdan Delcea, Nabeih Mazarieb, Gil N Bachar, Mohamed H Hassan, Mai Mazarieb

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of robotic surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Bogdan DelceaSurgical Department, Royal Free london NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Nabeih MazariebRadiology Department, , Rabin Medical Center (Hasharon Hospital), Petah Tikva, Israel.
Gil N BacharRadiology Department, , Rabin Medical Center (Hasharon Hospital), Petah Tikva, Israel.
Mohamed H HassanSurgical Department, Yeovil District Hospital , Somerset NHS Trust, Yeovil, UK.
Mai MazariebSurgical Department, Yeovil District Hospital , Somerset NHS Trust, Yeovil, UK. mayemazareeb@gmail.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Adhesiolysis is a technically demanding component of abdominal and pelvic reoperation. Robotic platforms may offer theoretical advantages in complex dissections; however, the clinical evidence specific to robotic adhesiolysis is limited. This review summarizes the current evidence, robotic-specific technical considerations, clinical rationale, patient selection, and future research priorities for robotic surgery in operations requiring adhesiolysis. A targeted narrative review of peer-reviewed literature on adhesion-related morbidity, adhesive small bowel obstruction (ASBO), laparoscopic adhesiolysis, and robotic surgery in patients with adhesions was performed. Current clinical data suggest that robotic surgery may reduce the conversion to open surgery due to adhesions in selected reoperative abdominal surgeries, particularly in expert hands and specific colorectal settings. However, outcomes beyond conversion, such as enterotomy rates, length of stay, and postoperative complications require further investigation. Successful robotic adhesiolysis relies on meticulous technical execution, including safe abdominal access, strategic port mapping, and appropriate instrument selection. Patient selection must carefully distinguish between elective reoperative surgery and emergency ASBO cases. Robotic adhesiolysis is a promising minimally invasive approach. Current evidence supports the cautious use of this approach in carefully selected patients. Future progress depends on standardized reporting, objective adhesion grading, prospective registries, and comparative studies that evaluate clinically relevant outcomes.

Indexed as

Robotic Surgical ProceduresHumansIntestinal ObstructionIntestine, SmallLaparoscopyPatient SelectionPostoperative ComplicationsReoperationTissue AdhesionsAbdominal adhesionsAdhesiolysisAdhesive small bowel obstructionConversionLaparoscopyMinimally invasive surgeryReoperative surgeryRobotic surgery

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.