ReviewJournal of robotic surgery2026
Robotic adhesiolysis: current evidence, technical considerations, and future directions.
Review in Journal of robotic surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Adhesiolysis is a technically demanding component of abdominal and pelvic reoperation. Robotic platforms may offer theoretical advantages in complex dissections; however, the clinical evidence specific to robotic adhesiolysis is limited. This review summarizes the current evidence, robotic-specific technical considerations, clinical rationale, patient selection, and future research priorities for robotic surgery in operations requiring adhesiolysis. A targeted narrative review of peer-reviewed literature on adhesion-related morbidity, adhesive small bowel obstruction (ASBO), laparoscopic adhesiolysis, and robotic surgery in patients with adhesions was performed. Current clinical data suggest that robotic surgery may reduce the conversion to open surgery due to adhesions in selected reoperative abdominal surgeries, particularly in expert hands and specific colorectal settings. However, outcomes beyond conversion, such as enterotomy rates, length of stay, and postoperative complications require further investigation. Successful robotic adhesiolysis relies on meticulous technical execution, including safe abdominal access, strategic port mapping, and appropriate instrument selection. Patient selection must carefully distinguish between elective reoperative surgery and emergency ASBO cases. Robotic adhesiolysis is a promising minimally invasive approach. Current evidence supports the cautious use of this approach in carefully selected patients. Future progress depends on standardized reporting, objective adhesion grading, prospective registries, and comparative studies that evaluate clinically relevant outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42525185What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.