ArticleSao Paulo medical journal = Revista paulista de medicina2026
Predictive modeling with machine learning for low birth weight in the state of São Paulo: a retrospective population-based study.
Article in Sao Paulo medical journal = Revista paulista de medicina, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundLow birth weight (LBW) is a major public health concern associated with increased neonatal morbidity and mortality.
objectiveThis study was aimed to develop a predictive learning model using machine learning techniques to identify LBW from live birth data.
methodsA retrospective population-based study was conducted using data from the Brazilian Live Birth Information System (SINASC), which includes all live births registered in the state of São Paulo between 2019 and 2023. After data curation and exclusion of records with missing or unknown information, a total of 2,548,570 live births were analyzed. Predictors included maternal sociodemographic characteristics, obstetric history, prenatal care indicators, and newborn characteristics. Logistic regression and random forest models were trained using an 80/20 train-test split, with class imbalance addressed through class weighting. Model performance was evaluated using accuracy, precision, recall, F1-score, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC-ROC).
resultsThe analysis showed that the balanced logistic regression model performed best in terms of sensitivity (0.688), F1-score (0.567), and AUC-ROC (0.850). A proportional analysis of the variables between the LBW and normal-weight groups revealed a higher prevalence of LBW among mothers with low education levels, without a partner, of Black or Brown ethnicity, aged ≤ 19 years or ≥ 35 years, with multiple pregnancies, with a reduced number of prenatal consultations, and with late initiation of prenatal care.
conclusionsThe findings highlight the importance of large-scale data analysis supported by machine learning techniques to inform public policies aimed at preventing LBW and promoting maternal and child health.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.