ArticleActa diabetologica2026
Migration background and diabetes technology use at diagnosis and follow-up in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes: a single-centre study.
Article in Acta diabetologica, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimsTo investigate whether migration background is associated with diabetes technology use at diagnosis and during follow-up in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes.
methodsThis cross-sectional study included children and adolescents aged 4-19 years with type 1 diabetes duration ≥ 1 year. Insulin pump therapy at diagnosis and diabetes technology use at follow-up (defined as insulin pump therapy or automated insulin delivery [AID]) were compared between participants with and without migration background. Multivariable logistic regression was used to assess factors associated with technology use.
resultsA total of 143 participants (mean age 13.2 ± 3.7 years) were included, of whom 24.5% had a migration background. At diabetes onset, insulin pump therapy was less frequent in participants with migration background compared to those without (28.6% vs. 50.0%, p = 0.027). At follow-up, diabetes technology use was numerically lower in participants with migration background (60.0% vs. 76.8%); however, the difference did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.052). In adjusted analyses, migration background was not significantly associated with diabetes technology use at follow-up (OR 2.33, 95% CI 0.92-5.89), whereas younger age and longer diabetes duration were independently associated with technology use.
conclusionsChildren with migration background were less likely to receive insulin pump therapy at diagnosis. At follow-up, differences in diabetes technology use were smaller and not statistically significant. These findings are consistent with the hypothesis of delayed technology uptake, although longitudinal studies are required to determine the timing of diabetes technology initiation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42525131What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.