ReviewSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2026
Febrile neutropenia in patients treated with chemotherapy/immune checkpoint inhibition: a MASCC consensus statement.
Review in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Chemotherapy/immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy is increasingly standard of care for a range of cancers. Increasing numbers of emergency cancer presentations mean alternative pathways are required to ensure sustainable services and improve outcomes. Febrile neutropenia (FN) is common in patients treated with chemotherapy/ICI therapy. Risk stratifying patients with FN is essential to personalise acute management and optimise use of healthcare resources. Management of patients with low-risk FN in an outpatient setting is proven to be safe and effective. The MASCC score is well validated for risk stratification in FN, and patients with a score ≥ 21 are likely to be suitable for outpatient management. It has not been validated in patients treated with combined chemotherapy/ICI regimens. This MASCC position paper outlines an approach for acute ambulatory management of low-risk FN in this cohort and produces ten position points. A literature search was performed up to the 31st May 2025 for outpatient management of FN in patients treated with chemotherapy/ICI therapy. Only one paper met the criteria highlighting the need for prospective and real-world data. Patients treated with a MASCC score < 21 are high risk and require standard neutropenic sepsis management. Empirical usage of high-dose steroids in patients presenting with FN on chemo/ICI therapy with grade ≥ 3 diarrhoea and/or transaminitis is not recommended. Patients treated with chemotherapy/ICI therapy with low-risk FN should be treated on the same pathway as those treated with chemotherapy alone with inclusion criteria adapted to recognise their eligibility. ICI-mediated neutropenia should be considered in patients receiving combined chemotherapy/ICI therapy when the timing of presentation is unanticipated or there is a failure of neutrophil recovery with persistent grade 3/4 neutropenia 10 days following administration. Initial treatment of suspected ICI-mediated neutropenia is to commence high-dose steroids and consider short-acting G-CSF.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.