Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42525046›Full record

ReviewEuropean journal of pediatrics2026

Continuous renal replacement therapy for septic shock: practicalities for a pediatric intensivist.

Lara Mary Titherington, Tommaso Bottesi, Francesco Guzzi, Stefano Romagnoli, Zaccaria Ricci

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in European journal of pediatrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Lara Mary Titherington *Department of Health Sciences, Section of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.
Tommaso Bottesi *Department of Health Sciences, Section of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.
Francesco GuzziDepartment of Medical Specialties, Nephrology and Dialysis Unit, Nuovo Ospedale Santo Stefano, Azienda USL Toscana Centro, Prato, Italy.
Stefano RomagnoliDepartment of Health Sciences, Section of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.
Zaccaria RicciDepartment of Health Sciences, Section of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, University of Florence, Florence, Italy. zaccaria.ricci@unifi.it.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8916-0569

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

High-volume hemofiltration (HVHF) has been proposed as an adjunctive extracorporeal strategy for children with sepsis or septic shock requiring continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT), based on the biological premise that enhanced convective clearance may attenuate circulating inflammatory mediator peaks. The 2026 Surviving Sepsis Campaign pediatric guidelines issued a conditional recommendation favoring HVHF over standard-volume hemofiltration in this setting, despite low-certainty evidence. This narrative review critically examines the biological rationale, available pediatric and adult evidence, and practical limitations of HVHF in pediatric septic shock. Although cytokines targeted by HVHF fall within the molecular-weight range theoretically amenable to clearance by high-flux membranes, clinical translation remains uncertain. Pediatric studies supporting HVHF are limited to small, single-center trials with heterogeneous dose definitions, variable treatment protocols, and fragile statistical estimates. In contrast, the largest observational pediatric datasets show no consistent dose-outcome relationship, while adult randomized trials and systematic reviews have failed to demonstrate survival benefit from higher-intensity or high-volume strategies. In small children, interpretation is further complicated by routine use of regional citrate anticoagulation, which may increase delivered effluent volume and blur the distinction between standard and high-volume prescriptions. Moreover, escalating CRRT dose has been potentially associated with dialytrauma, hemodynamic instability, micronutrient and amino acid losses, and clinically relevant antimicrobial underexposure.

conclusionCurrent evidence supports HVHF as biologically plausible but clinically unproven, with risks that should not be overlooked. WHAT IS KNOWN: • High-volume hemofiltration has a plausible biological rationale in pediatric sepsis, based on enhanced convective clearance of circulating inflammatory mediators. • The 2026 pediatric Surviving Sepsis Campaign guidelines recommended HVHF for children with sepsis or septic shock requiring renal replacement therapy. • The recommendation is labeled as "conditional" due to limited supporting evidence. WHAT IS NEW: • This review highlights that the pediatric evidence supporting HVHF is based on small single-center trials with heterogeneous definitions and statistically fragile estimates, while larger pediatric observational data and adult trials do not show a consistent dose-related clinical benefit. • Pediatric-specific factors, including regional citrate anticoagulation, high relative effluent doses in small children, and potential dialytrauma, may blur the distinction between standard and high-volume prescriptions and should temper routine clinical adoption.

Indexed as

Continuous Renal Replacement TherapyHemofiltrationShock, SepticChildHumansPractice Guidelines as TopicCitrate anticoagulationContinuous renal replacement therapyHemofiltrationPediatric septic shock

Identifiers

PMID42525046
PMCPMC13421279

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.