Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42525019›Full record

ArticleRevista brasileira de epidemiologia = Brazilian journal of epidemiology2026

Female homicides in the state of São Paulo, Brazil: a time series analysis from 1980 to 2022.

Edson Zangiacomi Martinez, Claudia Benedita Dos Santos, Elisangela Aparecida da Silva Lizzi, Miriane Lucindo Zucoloto

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Revista brasileira de epidemiologia = Brazilian journal of epidemiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Edson Zangiacomi MartinezUniversidade de São Paulo, Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirão Preto - Ribeirão Preto (SP), Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0949-3222
Claudia Benedita Dos SantosUniversidade de São Paulo, Escola de Enfermagem de Ribeirão Preto - Ribeirão Preto (SP), Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7241-7508
Elisangela Aparecida da Silva LizziUniversidade Tecnológica Federal do Paraná - Cornélio Procópio (PR), Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7064-263X
Miriane Lucindo ZucolotoUniversidade de São Paulo, Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirão Preto - Ribeirão Preto (SP), Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4745-227X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThis ecological study analyzes the temporal evolution of female homicide rates in the state of São Paulo, Brazil, from 1980 to 2022, using data from the Mortality Information System (SIM).

methodsPossible change points in the trend of these rates were identified using the Bayesian Estimator of Abrupt Change, Seasonality, and Trend (BEAST) model.

resultsA total of 29,234 female homicide cases were recorded during the period, including 3,914 among young women aged 15 to 19. The analysis detected two major change points in 1995 and 2004, dividing the time series into three segments: an increasing trend until 1994, a stable period from 1995 to 2003, and a decreasing trend from 2004 onward. Among young women, three change points were identified, with a significant and consistent decline in homicide rates from 2004 to 2022.

conclusionThe number of female homicides in São Paulo has declined significantly since 2004, particularly among young women aged 15-19. Although this is linked to policy changes, the decline is likely due to multiple factors. The study highlights the importance of ongoing gender-focused policies and robust analytical tools in guiding public safety efforts.

Indexed as

HomicideAdolescentBrazilFemaleHumansTime FactorsYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID42525019
PMCPMC13440504

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.