ArticleRevista latino-americana de enfermagem2026
Analysis of nursing consultations for people with systemic arterial hypertension in Primary Health Care.
Article in Revista latino-americana de enfermagem, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveto analyze nursing consultations with people with systemic arterial hypertension in primary health care according to the Brazilian Guidelines for Arterial Hypertension, the stages of the Nursing Process, and clinical communication.
methoda cross-sectional analytical study that evaluated 29 nursing consultations performed by 13 nurses with users with arterial hypertension in four Brazilian states. The consultations were assessed using a structured checklist. The data were subjected to descriptive and bivariate analyses, using tables and graphs to characterize the sample and explore potential associations among variables.
resultsthere was low adherence to the Nursing Process and the recommendations of the Brazilian Guidelines for Hypertension. Only 20% of the steps in the Nursing Process were fully complied with. Specifically, regarding the Guidelines, there was a lack of fundamental actions, such as blood pressure measurement, risk factor assessment, and communication of the diagnosis.
conclusionthere was a weakness in the application of the Nursing Process in consultations with people with hypertension. Factors such as case complexity, interruptions, high work demands, gaps in training, and the absence of structured protocols contributed to these findings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.