ArticleCadernos de saude publica2026
[Food insecurity in quilombola communities in Marajó, Brazilian Amazon: prevalence and associated factors].
Article in Cadernos de saude publica, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aimed to determine the prevalence of food insecurity in Marajoara quilombola communities and its associated factors. A cross-sectional, community-based, family-approach study was carried out with 434 families in Salvaterra, Marajó Island, Pará, Brazil, from June to July 2021. A household survey was carried out with a standardized questionnaire on sociodemographic data and the Brazilian Food Insecurity Scale. A multivariate logistic regression was used to analyze associated factors. Most quilombola families (88.9%) lied in food insecurity, 33.1% (n = 144) of whom in severe insecurity; 21.4% (n = 93), in moderate insecurity; and 34.3% (n = 149), in mild insecurity. The regression model showed that receiving no pension doubles the chance of mild food insecurity and multiplies moderate+severe insecurity by 5 times. Per capita family income below 1/5 or even 1/3 of the minimum wage increase the chance of moderate+severe insecurity by 9 and 9 times, respectively. Households in the B/C economic classification were 21% less likely to have moderate+severe insecurity than those with the D/E classification. Food insecurity had a high prevalence in quilombola families, with a preponderance of moderate+severe insecurity. Family income and its components configured the main factors associated with food insecurity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.