ArticleRevista brasileira de enfermagem2026
Prev-Sepse Pediátrica: content validation of a digital serious game on pediatric sepsis.
Article in Revista brasileira de enfermagem, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesto validate the content of a digital serious game on pediatric sepsis.
methodsmethodological content validation study conducted in two rounds with expert judges (nurses and physicians). In the first round, the expert panel evaluated all screens of the initial prototype. After adjustments, the second version of the game underwent content validation using the Health Educational Content Validation Instrument (IVCES), and the agreement rate and Content Validity Index (CVI) were calculated.
resultsin the first round, 11 judges evaluated the game and made suggestions, all of which were incorporated. The second round involved nine judges. The overall agreement rate for the prototype items was 100%, and the overall CVI was 0.99.
conclusionsthe game was modified according to the judges' feedback, and its content was validated for use as a tool for teaching and learning about pediatric sepsis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.