Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42524912›Full record

SynthesisArquivos de gastroenterologia2026

MANAGEMENT OF CLOSTRIDIOIDES DIFFICILE INFECTION IN INFLAMMATORY BOWEL DISEASE: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS OF ANTIBIOTIC EFFICACY.

Isadora Brandão Pelucio, Carla Malaguti, Túlio Medina Dutra de Oliveira, Karoline Maria de Souza Marques Chitarra, Maria Cristina Vasconcellos Furtado, Júlio Maria Fonseca Chebli

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Arquivos de gastroenterologia, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Isadora Brandão PelucioUniversidade Federal de Juiz de Fora (UFJF), Programa de Pós-Graduação em Saúde, Juiz de Fora, MG, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7258-8155
Carla MalagutiUniversidade Federal de Juiz de Fora (UFJF), Departamento de Fisioterapia do Idoso, Adulto e Materno/Infantil, Juiz de Fora, MG, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6619-136X
Túlio Medina Dutra de OliveiraUniversidade Federal de Juiz de Fora (UFJF), Faculdade de Medicina, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Saúde, Juiz de Fora, MG, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1160-2456
Karoline Maria de Souza Marques ChitarraUniversidade Federal de Juiz de Fora (UFJF), Faculdade de Medicina, Curso de Medicina, Juiz de Fora, MG, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0002-7020-2903
Maria Cristina Vasconcellos FurtadoUniversidade Federal de Juiz de Fora (UFJF), Faculdade de Medicina, Departamento de Cirurgia, Juiz de Fora, MG, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0843-5709
Júlio Maria Fonseca ChebliUniversidade Federal de Juiz de Fora (UFJF), Faculdade de Medicina, Departamento de Clínica Médica, Juiz de Fora, MG, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1527-0663

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundClostridioides difficile infection (CDI) is a significant complication in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), often associated with higher recurrence rates, increased morbidity, and complex therapeutic decision-making. The optimal antibiotic regimen for CDI in IBD remains uncertain.

objectiveTo evaluate the efficacy of different antibiotic therapies for CDI in patients with IBD.

methodsA systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted according to PRISMA 2020 guidelines. Searches were performed in MEDLINE, EMBASE, PubMed, Epistemonikos, and the Cochrane Library through October 2024. Observational studies and clinical trials comparing antibiotic regimens in adult IBD patients with CDI were included. Data on recurrence, clinical outcomes, colectomy, and mortality were extracted. Random-effects meta-analysis was performed when appropriate.

resultsNine studies involving 643 patients met inclusion criteria. Recurrence occurred in 17.4% of patients treated with metronidazole and 8.2% of those treated with vancomycin. In the meta-analysis of four studies (n=214), vancomycin showed a trend toward lower recurrence, although not statistically significant (OR 0.55; 95%CI 0.15-1.99; P=0.36; I2=66%). Mortality was low and similar between groups, and colectomy occurred exclusively in patients with ulcerative colitis. Data on clinical success and adverse events were heterogeneously reported and summarized narratively.

conclusionVancomycin may be associated with lower recurrence in higher-risk IBD patients; however, available evidence remains limited and heterogeneous. Treatment decisions should be individualized, and further prospective, IBD-specific studies are needed to clarify optimal management strategies.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsClostridium InfectionsInflammatory Bowel DiseasesClostridioides difficileHumansMetronidazoleRecurrenceTreatment OutcomeVancomycinAnti-Bacterial AgentsMetronidazoleVancomycin

Identifiers

PMID42524912
PMCPMC13399930

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.