ArticleBiochemistry and molecular biology education : a bimonthly publication of the International Union of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology
Bridging the Python Training Gap for Bioscientists in Brazil: Improvements and Challenges.
Article in Biochemistry and molecular biology education : a bimonthly publication of the International Union of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The rapid evolution of high-throughput technologies in biosciences generates vast and diverse datasets, demanding that bioscientists develop advanced data manipulation and analysis skills. Python, with its versatility and powerful libraries, has become a crucial tool for managing these datasets. However, a significant lack of programming training for bioscientists persists in many countries. To address this knowledge gap in Brazil, the Brazilian Python Workshop for Biological Data was introduced several years ago, focusing on fundamental programming concepts and data handling techniques using popular Python libraries. Despite positive feedback from earlier editions, persistent challenges necessitated continuous adaptation to meet the evolving needs of bioscientists. This work describes the advancements implemented in the 2021 and 2022 editions of the workshop and discusses suggestions for its ongoing enhancement. Key innovations were introduced in the workshop's structure and coordination, including new committees and a code of conduct. Feedback forms were updated for real-time adjustments, and the event's reach was expanded to increase geographical diversity. New didactic strategies, such as pair-teaching, code clubs, and the integration of ICTs, were implemented to enhance learning outcomes. Programming best practices and scientific reproducibility were emphasized through talks and hands-on activities guided by PEP8 conventions. Furthermore, scientific dissemination was intensified through an increased social media presence and participation in international events. Finally, we present updated recommendations for students, researchers, and educators interested in organizing similar initiatives.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.