Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42524827›Full record

Trial reportTranslational vision science & technology2026

Visual Performance of Defocus Incorporated Multiple Segments With Triple Enhanced Design Spectacle Lenses Versus DIMS and Single Vision Lenses.

Carly Siu Yin Lam, Kenneth Ka King Liu, Han Yu Zhang, Paul Lee, Hua Qi, Keigo Hasegawa, Shohei Matsuoka, Daisy Ka Yan Leung, Dennis Yan Yin Tse, Chi Ho To

Abstract readComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Translational vision science & technology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Carly Siu Yin LamCentre for Myopia Research, School of Optometry, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong, China.
Kenneth Ka King LiuCentre for Myopia Research, School of Optometry, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong, China.
Han Yu ZhangSchool of Medicine, Nankai University, Tianjin, China.
Paul LeeSouthampton Clinical Trials Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
Hua QiTechnical Research and Development, HOYA Vision Care, HOYA Corporation, Tokyo, Japan.
Keigo HasegawaTechnical Research and Development, HOYA Vision Care, HOYA Corporation, Tokyo, Japan.
Shohei MatsuokaTechnical Research and Development, HOYA Vision Care, HOYA Corporation, Tokyo, Japan.
Daisy Ka Yan LeungCentre for Myopia Research, School of Optometry, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong, China.
Dennis Yan Yin TseCentre for Myopia Research, School of Optometry, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong, China.
Chi Ho ToCentre for Myopia Research, School of Optometry, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: To compare short-term visual functions changes in myopic children who had worn the defocus incorporated multiple segment (DIMS), DIMS with triple enhanced design (DIMS TED), and single-vision (SV) spectacle lenses. Methods: Thirty-eight Chinese children (six to 13 years) with spherical equivalent refractive error -1.00 D to -5.00 D were recruited. Participants wore DIMS, DIMS TED and SV spectacle lenses in random order. High- and low-contrast distance and near visual acuity (VA), mid-peripheral near VA, binocular functions, accommodation and visual symptoms were assessed before and after 1-week of lens wear, while mid-peripheral distance VA was assessed with and without glare in a second visit. Results: Most visual functions showed no differences before and after lens wear. Central high- and low-contrast distance VA and central high-contrast near VA under room and dim lighting were unaffected by DIMS and DIMS TED spectacle lenses compared to SV lenses (all P > 0.05). Central low-contrast near VA was reduced by 0.06 ± 0.10 logMAR in DIMS TED lenses compared to DIMS lenses under room lighting (P < 0.01), and by 0.06 ± 0.11 logMAR compared with SV spectacle lenses under dim lighting (P < 0.01). Mid-peripheral distance VA and near VA were reduced by approximately 0.10 logMAR in DIMS TED and DIMS compared to SV lenses (P < 0.01), respectively. However, these reductions are unlikely to represent a clinically meaningful impairment in visual function. Most children adapted and accepted the DIMS TED spectacle lenses well. Conclusions: DIMS TED spectacle lenses demonstrated visual performance comparable to DIMS and SV spectacle lenses. Translational Relevance: The enhanced design of the DIMS TED spectacle lenses maintains visual performance comparable to DIMS and single vision spectacle lenses, and may potentially increase myopia control efficacy.

Indexed as

EyeglassesMyopiaRefraction, OcularVisual AcuityAccommodation, OcularAdolescentChildEquipment DesignFemaleHumansMaleVision, Binocular

Identifiers

PMID42524827
PMCPMC13426864

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.