ReviewInfectious diseases & immunity2026
Invasive fungal disease in patients with end-stage liver disease.
Review in Infectious diseases & immunity, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Invasive fungal disease (IFD) has become a critical complication in patients with end-stage liver disease (ESLD), marked by a rising prevalence and the emergence of drug-resistant strains in recent decades. The heightened susceptibility to IFD in ESLD stems from liver-related immune dysfunction, structural changes, and iatrogenic factors, such as invasive procedures, broad-spectrum antibiotics, and immunosuppressive therapies. Timely diagnosis is essential for effective management, yet it remains challenging. This review examines both conventional culture-based and advanced culture-independent diagnostic techniques, including polymerase chain reaction-based assays and the T2Candida Panel. Treatment strategies are stratified according to diagnostic certainty (proven, probable, or possible IFD), although therapeutic efficacy is often limited by antifungal hepatotoxicity and drug resistance. We summarize current treatment recommendations for common IFD pathogens, with an emphasis on pharmacokinetic considerations and dose adjustments in ESLD patients. Given the growing clinical burden of IFD in ESLD, further research is urgently needed to optimize IFD management and prophylaxis in this high-risk population. This review also outlines key priorities for addressing future challenges in diagnosis and therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.