ArticleIndian journal of occupational and environmental medicine
Assessment of Health and Wellness Practices among the Working Women in Western India.
Article in Indian journal of occupational and environmental medicine. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Context: In India, women bear a multitude of obligations, including caring for dependents, raising children, and managing the home, all while compromising their own health. Numerous studies have demonstrated that women are experiencing higher levels of stress. Aims and Objectives: (1) To assess health- and wellness-related practices among working women in India. (2) To determine demographic and work-related factors associated with wellness among the working women. Settings and Design: It was an online cross-sectional study conducted by investigators at a tertiary care hospital. Subjects and Methods: Snowball sampling method was used in the study to get the responses from the participants. Total 441 responses were received, which were analyzed. Statistical Analysis Used: Descriptive statistics was calculated based on the type of data. The Chi-square test of significance was used to show the association. Results: The mean age of the participant was 39.61 years with standard deviation ± 7.89 years. Most of the participants were married, had higher education, and belonged to a nuclear family. They were working in different occupational sectors. Though the majority, i.e., 70.75% of the women, had good health and wellness score, a notable portion of women showed poor score, which had significant association with younger age and long job hours. Conclusion: The findings indicate that younger age and long working hours are associated with poor scores. While a majority of women in this study report good health scores and satisfactory work-life balance, the significant percentage experiencing poor scores highlights critical areas for improvement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.