ArticleArchives of academic emergency medicine2026
Predicting Drowning Mortality Risk Using Machine Learning Models; A Retrospective Cohort Study.
Article in Archives of academic emergency medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Particularly in highly tourist-active coastal locations, drowning is still a serious international public health concern. This study investigates the predictive value of machine learning approaches in estimating drowning-related mortality risk. Methods: This retrospective cohort study analyzed drowning incident data from the Emergency Management and Medical Urgency Center of Guilan Province, covering the period from 2018 to 2023. The data were preprocessed, missing values imputed using the K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN) algorithm, and balanced using the Synthetic Minority Over-sampling Technique (SMOTE). Three models including logistic regression, decision tree, and naïve Bayes were evaluated in predicting the risk of mortality following drowning and sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of each model was calculated and compared. Results: A total of 600 consecutive cases meeting the eligibility criteria were extracted for analysis, forming the final dataset. Logistic regression exhibited the highest predictive power, with an accuracy of 51.67% and an area under the curve (AUC) of 60.02%. The most influential variables in drowning-related mortality prediction were drowning location, drowning year, gender, and age. High-risk areas posed a 33-fold higher mortality risk than safe locations (p < 0.001). Age and gender were not statistically significant predictors of fatal drowning. Conclusion: Given its superior interpretability and predictive capability, logistic regression was identified as the most effective model for assessing drowning mortality risk. Preventative measures should focus on identifying high-risk areas, installing warning signs, implementing lifeguard teams, educating tourists, and enforcing strict coastal safety regulations to mitigate drowning fatalities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.