ArticleJournal of wrist surgery2026
The Arthroscopic Wafer Procedure in Patients with Ulnar Impaction Syndrome.
Article in Journal of wrist surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aim: We aimed to show the outcomes of patients with ulnar impaction syndrome who had surgical treatment with the arthroscopic wafer procedure between 2013 and 2024. Materials and Methods: We analyzed data from 22 patients (22 wrists) treated with the arthroscopic wafer procedure. Visual analogue scale (VAS) score, Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH), and Mayo Wrist scoring systems were used for clinical evaluation, grip strength, and wrist range of motion (ROM) were compared with the nonoperative side, local tenderness examination at triangular fibrocartilage complex location between pisiform bone and ulnar head and ulnar grind test were evaluated. Patients were also asked to rate their satisfaction with the surgery. In radiological evaluations, preoperative and postoperative ulnar variance was measured. Results: The mean follow-up period was 58.6 months. The mean VAS score was 2.86, the mean DASH score was 24.58, and the mean MAYO score was 72.64. There was no significant difference in wrist ROM between the operated side and the contralateral side ( Conclusion: According to our study findings, arthroscopic wafer procedure as a minimally invasive method provided satisfactory clinical and functional results with lower complication rates in patients with ulnar impaction syndrome.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.