ArticleJournal of wrist surgery2026
Exploring Lower Tourniquet Pressures in Upper Extremity Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
Article in Journal of wrist surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Pneumatic tourniquets are routinely used in upper extremity surgery to create a bloodless operative field, often at a standard pressure of 250 mm Hg. However, high pressures may lead to complications, including tissue damage and increased pain. This study investigates whether tailoring tourniquet pressures to individual systolic blood pressure (SBP) can achieve comparable surgical field visualization while reducing inflation pressure. Materials and Methods: This double-blinded, randomized controlled trial enrolled patients undergoing upper extremity surgery. The control group used fixed tourniquet pressures of 250 mm Hg, while the intervention group applied pressures based on SBP: <130 mm Hg → add 60 mm Hg, 131 to 190 mm Hg → add 80 mm Hg, >190 mm Hg → add 100 mm Hg. Outcomes included intraoperative tourniquet adjustments, surgeon-rated surgical field quality (1-excellent to 4-poor), and patient-reported tourniquet pain (visual analog scale). Data were analyzed using Fisher's exact tests and Results: Seventy-nine patients (control: 32, intervention: 47) were included. Mean tourniquet pressure was lower in the intervention group (192.81 ± 27.27 mm Hg) versus the control (250 mm Hg). Quality of the bloodless field was comparable (93.75% vs. 97.87%, Conclusion: SBP-based tourniquet pressures effectively maintain surgical field visualization at lower pressures without compromising safety or increasing pain. These findings support wider adoption of this method and warrant further large-scale studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.