ArticleEuropean heart journal. Case reports2026
Lessons learned from Micra leadless pacemaker retrieval: a case series.
Article in European heart journal. Case reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Retrieving an implanted leadless pacemaker is a challenging component of its management. However, there are no dedicated tools specifically designed for retrieving the Micra leadless pacemaker. Given the lack of commercial retrieval systems, there is an urgent need to document and validate alternative interventional strategies to manage complications associated with device malfunction or migration. Case summary: In this series, we present cases involving increased capture threshold, device embolization into the right pulmonary artery, and broken tines following Micra implantation. We successfully completed four retrieval procedures using a coordinated approach with existing devices, including the Micra transcatheter pacing system, coronary angiography catheter, and endovascular snare system. Discussion: Notably, these cases exhibited different characteristics during the retrieval of the Micra leadless pacemaker, which may assist colleagues in dealing with such scenarios. Our experience demonstrates that a strategy combining the Micra delivery catheter with an endovascular snare system, without the need for a steerable sheath, was sufficient and effective for successful Micra retrieval.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.