ArticlePediatric quality & safety
Improving Rates of Routine Vaccinations in Adolescents at an Academic Children's Hospital.
Article in Pediatric quality & safety. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: This project sought to increase the vaccination completion rate to 95% in an adolescent medicine practice. We aimed to increase the percentage of individuals who were up to date on their meningococcal, human papillomavirus, and tetanus, diphtheria, and pertussis vaccinations to 80% and to verify that these efforts led to more equitable care. Methods: We used the Model for Improvement. After a current-state analysis, the team implemented a bundled intervention that included obtaining missing records, notifying providers about patients who needed vaccinations, and providing electronic medical record alerts when vaccinations were due. Patients received vaccine education, and nurses offered a numbing spray to mitigate needle-related vaccine hesitancy. Results: Statistical process control charts showed a shift in the percentage of complete vaccination records from 88% to 95%. There was a mean shift for the combined meningococcal, human papillomavirus, and tetanus, diphtheria, and pertussis completion percentage from 70% to 76%. All race and payer subgroups improved with the interventions. Racial disparity analysis for the completion percentage pre- and postintervention showed that there were 2 disparities observed between the reference group, Hispanic patients, and other racial groups. No disparities were observed between publicly and privately insured patients before or after the interventions. Conclusions: The bundled intervention was associated with higher rates of vaccine documentation and administration. The highly engaged nursing staff and innovative technology drove success.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.