Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42524545›Full record

ArticleJournal of the Royal Society of New Zealand2026

Modelling Future Evolution of the Antarctic Ice Sheet With Explainable Machine Learning.

Paula Maddigan, Bach Hoai Nguyen, Peter Yu Feng Siew, Bing Xue, Nicholas Golledge, Mengjie Zhang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the Royal Society of New Zealand, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Paula MaddiganCentre for Data Science and Artificial Intelligence & School of Engineering and Computer Science, Victoria University of Wellington Wellington New Zealand.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5962-4403
Bach Hoai NguyenCentre for Data Science and Artificial Intelligence & School of Engineering and Computer Science, Victoria University of Wellington Wellington New Zealand.
Peter Yu Feng SiewCentre for Data Science and Artificial Intelligence & School of Engineering and Computer Science, Victoria University of Wellington Wellington New Zealand.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4163-4416
Bing XueCentre for Data Science and Artificial Intelligence & School of Engineering and Computer Science, Victoria University of Wellington Wellington New Zealand.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4865-8026
Nicholas GolledgeAntarctic Research Centre, Victoria University of Wellington Wellington New Zealand.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7676-8970
Mengjie ZhangCentre for Data Science and Artificial Intelligence & School of Engineering and Computer Science, Victoria University of Wellington Wellington New Zealand.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The accelerating effects of climate change, particularly rising sea levels resulting from melting land ice, require accurate predictions of ice sheet dynamics. Traditional numerical models, such as the Parallel Ice Sheet Model (PISM), are widely used; however, they rely on simplifying assumptions and are computationally intensive, limiting their ability to make long-term predictions. This study addresses these limitations by employing machine learning techniques to emulate ice sheet dynamics, offering a faster, more efficient alternative to traditional numerical models. Using data generated by PISM for the Antarctic ice sheet spanning 2015 to 2100, we develop proof-of-concept machine learning models that predict key ice properties-ice mask, ice thickness, and ice velocity-based on climate inputs. Our models tackle both spatial and temporal challenges by incorporating the ice properties of neighbouring cells and past temporal values, thereby improving predictive accuracy. Additionally, explainable AI (XAI) techniques are applied to enhance trust and explainability. Our best-performing model, a Random Forest with an expanding window, achieves an average RMSE of 3.36 for thickness and 65.6 for velocity and misclassifies on average only 3 grid points per year for the ice mask out of 2257, demonstrating good accuracy comparable to that of the original simulator at a fraction of the computational cost. This approach not only improves the computational efficiency of scenario modelling but also contributes to the broader field of climate science by enabling more frequent and extensive analyses of climate change impacts on Antarctic ice sheets.

Indexed as

explainable AI (XAI)ice sheet dynamicsmachine learningspatial–temporal data

Identifiers

PMID42524545
PMCPMC13412399

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.