In one paragraphArticle in Animal reproduction, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from itWhat it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
2 · The registryThe trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
3 · Its place in the literatureWho cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
4 · The recordCorrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
5 · Who and what moneyAuthors and funding
16 authors.
Francisco Denilson Rodrigues GomesLaboratório de Manipulação de Oócitos e Folículos Ovarianos Pré-Antrais, Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária, Universidade Estadual do Ceará, Fortaleza, CE, Brasil.ORCID 0000-0003-4636-4195 Lucy Vanessa Sulca ÑaupasLaboratório de Manipulação de Oócitos e Folículos Ovarianos Pré-Antrais, Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária, Universidade Estadual do Ceará, Fortaleza, CE, Brasil.ORCID 0000-0003-0085-7306 Gaby Judith Quispe PalominoLaboratório de Manipulação de Oócitos e Folículos Ovarianos Pré-Antrais, Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária, Universidade Estadual do Ceará, Fortaleza, CE, Brasil.ORCID 0000-0003-2957-0536 Rensson Homero Céliz YgnácioLaboratório de Manipulação de Oócitos e Folículos Ovarianos Pré-Antrais, Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária, Universidade Estadual do Ceará, Fortaleza, CE, Brasil.ORCID 0000-0003-2490-9342 Naiza Arcângela Ribeiro de SáLaboratório de Manipulação de Oócitos e Folículos Ovarianos Pré-Antrais, Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária, Universidade Estadual do Ceará, Fortaleza, CE, Brasil.ORCID 0000-0003-4745-0108 Anna Clara Accioly FerreiraLaboratório de Manipulação de Oócitos e Folículos Ovarianos Pré-Antrais, Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária, Universidade Estadual do Ceará, Fortaleza, CE, Brasil.ORCID 0000-0002-2125-9471 Marco Aurélio Schiavo NovaesLaboratório de Manipulação de Oócitos e Folículos Ovarianos Pré-Antrais, Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária, Universidade Estadual do Ceará, Fortaleza, CE, Brasil.ORCID 0000-0001-9777-2530 Gustavo Bezerra Nobre do ValeLaboratório de Manipulação de Oócitos e Folículos Ovarianos Pré-Antrais, Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária, Universidade Estadual do Ceará, Fortaleza, CE, Brasil.ORCID 0009-0003-1658-5269 Bruna Novaes CostaLaboratório de Reprodução Animal, Departamento de Ciências Fisiológicas, Instituto de Ciências Biológicas, Campus Universitário Darcy Ribeiro, Brasília, DF, Brasil.ORCID 0000-0002-4634-9334 Carolina Madeira LucciLaboratório de Reprodução Animal, Departamento de Ciências Fisiológicas, Instituto de Ciências Biológicas, Campus Universitário Darcy Ribeiro, Brasília, DF, Brasil.ORCID 0000-0001-7763-0746 César Carneiro Linhares FernandesFaculdade de Ciências da Saúde, Universidade de Fortaleza, Fortaleza, CE, Brasil.ORCID 0000-0001-6205-7086 Davide RondinaLaboratório de Nutrição e Produção de Ruminantes, Universidade Estadual do Ceará, Fortaleza, CE, Brasil.ORCID 0000-0003-0474-8895 Alexandre Rodrigues SilvaLaboratório de Conservação de Germoplasma Animal, Departamento de Ciência Animal, Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido, Mossoró, RN, Brasil.ORCID 0000-0001-6027-1062 José Ricardo de FigueiredoLaboratório de Manipulação de Oócitos e Folículos Ovarianos Pré-Antrais, Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária, Universidade Estadual do Ceará, Fortaleza, CE, Brasil.ORCID 0000-0002-5139-0964 Gildas Mbemya TetapingLaboratório de Manipulação de Oócitos e Folículos Ovarianos Pré-Antrais, Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária, Universidade Estadual do Ceará, Fortaleza, CE, Brasil.ORCID 0000-0003-4455-362X Ana Paula Ribeiro RodriguesLaboratório de Manipulação de Oócitos e Folículos Ovarianos Pré-Antrais, Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária, Universidade Estadual do Ceará, Fortaleza, CE, Brasil.ORCID 0000-0001-9786-1250 Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
6 · The paper itselfAbstract
This study This study aimed to evaluate two conservation times (2h vs 6h) at 4 ºC of prepubertal goat testicles for subsequent slow freezing and 3D in vitro culture. Testicular fragments from six animals were preserved at 4 ºC for 2 or 6 h. After 2 or 6 h of conservation, the fragments were randomly fixed, constituting the control (CTR2; CTR6), cultured in vitro (IVC2; IVC6), frozen (SFZ2; SFZ6), or frozen and cultured in vitro (SFZIVC2; SFZIVC6). All fragments were analyzed by classical histology (morphology), immunohistochemistry (PCNA), immunofluorescence (β-catenin), PCRq-RT (Oct4, C- kit, Bax, Bcl-2), transmission (TEM), and scanning (SEM) electron microscopy, respectively. The histomorphological data showed that regardless of the conservation time, whether followed by cryopreservation or not, epithelial (Ealt) and nuclear (Nalt) alterations increased after 48 h of IVC (p<0.05). Immunostaining for β-catenin was lower (p < 0.05) in SFZIVC2 and SFZIVC6 fragments compared with IVC2 and IVC6, respectively. Oct4 expression in SFZ6 was lower than that in CTR6 (p < 0.05). Conversely, C-kit expression was similar among CTR2, CTR6, SFZ2, and SFZ6 fragments. Bax and Bcl-2 expression were also similar among IVC2, IVC6, SFZIVC2, and SFZIVC6 fragments. The Bax/Bcl-2 ratio in IVC2 and SFZIVC6 was higher than that observed in CTR2 and SFZ6, respectively. In conclusion, our results demonstrate that controlling the duration of testicular storage at 4 °C before slow freezing and/or in vitro culture directly affects the viability and quality of testicular tissue, thereby influencing the success of reproductive function preservation.
Indexed as
goatin vitro culturemale fertilityslow freezingtesticles
Identifiers
PMID42524497
PMCPMC13412006
What OpenQuestion holds
Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390