Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42524470›Full record

ArticleAnimal reproduction2026

Cryopreservation of jaguar (

Sofia Regina Polizelle, Ian Figueiredo Navarezi, Maite Cardoso Coelho da Silva, Giulia Correia Vieira, Liandra Martiliano Gaeth, Larissa Schneider Brandão-Souza, Bianca Rodrigues Acacio, Pedro Nacib Jorge-Neto, Eliane Vianna da Costa E Silva, Thyara de Deco-Souza and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animal reproduction, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Sofia Regina PolizelleUniversidade Federal de Mato Grosso do Sul, Campo Grande, MS, Brasil.ORCID 0000-0003-1955-3951
Ian Figueiredo NavareziUniversidade Federal de Mato Grosso do Sul, Campo Grande, MS, Brasil.ORCID 0009-0009-5185-6806
Maite Cardoso Coelho da SilvaUniversidade Federal de Mato Grosso do Sul, Campo Grande, MS, Brasil.ORCID 0000-0002-0047-3911
Giulia Correia VieiraUniversidade Federal de Mato Grosso do Sul, Campo Grande, MS, Brasil.ORCID 0009-0002-9306-1074
Liandra Martiliano GaethUniversidade Federal de Mato Grosso do Sul, Campo Grande, MS, Brasil.ORCID 0009-0006-9978-4635
Larissa Schneider Brandão-SouzaUniversidade Federal de Mato Grosso do Sul, Campo Grande, MS, Brasil.ORCID 0000-0002-2857-305X
Bianca Rodrigues AcacioUniversidade Federal de Mato Grosso do Sul, Campo Grande, MS, Brasil.ORCID 0000-0002-2643-1170
Pedro Nacib Jorge-NetoUniversidade Federal de Mato Grosso do Sul, Campo Grande, MS, Brasil.ORCID 0000-0002-5894-0148
Eliane Vianna da Costa E SilvaUniversidade Federal de Mato Grosso do Sul, Campo Grande, MS, Brasil.ORCID 0000-0003-1575-8490
Thyara de Deco-SouzaUniversidade Federal de Mato Grosso do Sul, Campo Grande, MS, Brasil.ORCID 0000-0002-5157-3605
Alexsandra Fernandes PereiraLaboratório de Biotecnologia Animal, Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido, Mossoró, RN, Brasil.ORCID 0000-0003-2137-854X
Gediendson Ribeiro de AraujoUniversidade Federal de Mato Grosso do Sul, Campo Grande, MS, Brasil.ORCID 0000-0002-6460-946X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Somatic cells serve as essential genetic resources for biobanking. Traditionally, jaguar fibroblast-like cells are frozen in cryovials using slow-freezing protocols. However, this approach necessitates access to ultra-low temperature freezers and requires substantial storage capacity. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of a rapid-freezing protocol as a feasible alternative for the freezing of jaguar fibroblasts. Following cultivation to the third passage, cells were frozen using either slow-freezing (SF) or rapid-freezing (RF). For SF, cells were frozen in cryovials (-1 ºC/min), whereas RF involved rapid-freezing (-60 ºC/min) using nitrogen vapor and storage in 0.25 mL straws. Post-thaw, cells were re-cultured to assess recovery. Cell viability was assessed via light microscopy (Trypan blue), fluorescence microscopy (acridine orange + propidium iodide), and flow cytometry (Hoechst 33342 + propidium iodide) immediately post-thaw and upon reaching confluency (> 80%). Fresh culture viability assessed by Trypan blue, acridine orange, and flow cytometry was 98.2 ± 0.3%, 88.7 ± 3.9%, and 94.2 ± 2.2%, respectively. No significant differences in viability were observed between SF and RF immediately post-thaw or after subsequent cultivation. All three assays revealed significant differences (

Indexed as

big catsbiobankingconservationcryopreservationfelids

Identifiers

PMID42524470
PMCPMC13412005

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.