ArticleJournal of Cancer2026
Integrative bulk and single-cell transcriptomic analysis identify an ac4C-related signature in lung adenocarcinoma.
Article in Journal of Cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: N4-acetylcytidine (ac4C) RNA modification is a critical epitranscriptomic regulator of cancer progression, yet its specific biological functions and regulatory patterns in lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) remain poorly understood. This study aims to characterize the clinical relevance and potential regulatory patterns of ac4C-related features in the LUAD tumor microenvironment (TME). Methods: We integrated bulk RNA-seq data from TCGA and single-cell RNA-seq (scRNA-seq) data from GEO. Weighted gene co-expression network analysis (WGCNA) identified prognosis-related modules. A robust six-gene ac4C-related signature was derived using three consensus machine learning algorithms: LASSO, Random Forest, and SVM-RFE. The signature was further validated using pseudotime trajectory inference, CellChat-based intercellular communication analysis, and Results: The six-gene signature effectively stratified LUAD patients, identifying a high-risk subgroup characterized by poor survival and frequent TP53 mutations. Single-cell analysis suggested that high ac4C-related signature scores were associated with advanced malignant states and enhanced predicted pro-tumorigenic signaling within the TME, particularly involving the EGF, TGFB, and MIF pathways. Pharmacogenomic modeling identified increased sensitivity to CDK and PLK1 inhibitors in high-risk patients. Experimentally, PLK1 silencing significantly suppressed LUAD cell proliferation and migration. Conclusions: This study identifies a potential ac4C-related prognostic signature associated with malignant cell states and predicted communication patterns within the TME, and suggests PLK1 as a candidate therapeutic target in LUAD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.