Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42524415›Full record

ArticleISME communications2026

D- and L-lactate consumers are taxonomically, biochemically, and energetically different.

Maximilienne T Allaart, Alexander V Tyakht, Ruth E Ley, Martin Pabst, Gerben R Stouten, Largus T Angenent

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ISME communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Maximilienne T AllaartEnvironmental Biotechnology Group, Department of Geosciences, University of Tübingen, Schnarrenbergstraße 94-96, 72076 Tübingen, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9711-3954
Alexander V TyakhtDepartment of Microbiome Science, Max Planck Institute for Biology, Max Planck Ring 5, 72076 Tübingen, Germany.
Ruth E LeyDepartment of Microbiome Science, Max Planck Institute for Biology, Max Planck Ring 5, 72076 Tübingen, Germany.
Martin PabstEnvironmental Biotechnology, Department of Biotechnology, Delft University of Technology, Van der Maasweg 9, 2629 Delft, HZ, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9897-0723
Gerben R StoutenEnvironmental Biotechnology Group, Department of Geosciences, University of Tübingen, Schnarrenbergstraße 94-96, 72076 Tübingen, Germany.
Largus T AngenentEnvironmental Biotechnology Group, Department of Geosciences, University of Tübingen, Schnarrenbergstraße 94-96, 72076 Tübingen, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0180-1865

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

D- and L-lactate are routinely produced as intermediates in fermentative ecosystems. However, the microbial fate of these stereoisomers remains poorly understood. Given that D-lactate is an unavoidable byproduct of digestion and a neurotoxin, understanding its microbial turnover not only holds ecological pertinence but also the potential to uncover new links between gut microbiota metabolism and host health. Here, we used chemostat bioreactors (pH 7.0, 37°C, and a solids retention time of 4 days) to enrich for lactate-consuming communities. DL-lactate-consuming consortia were enriched, characterized, and used as inoculum for duplicate bioreactors fed exclusively with D- or L-lactate. After steady-state was reached, the fed lactate stereoisomers were switched to assess community resilience. Regardless of the fed stereoisomer, the fermentation product spectra were consistent and dominated by acetate, propionate, and CO

Indexed as

acrylate pathwaychemostat bioreactorlactate stereoisomersmethylmalonyl-CoA pathwaymicrobiotapropionate

Identifiers

PMID42524415
PMCPMC13411273

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.