ArticleBMJ public health2026
Health vulnerability and loneliness among adolescent and young adult populations: a comparison of generations based on a nationwide survey in Japan.
Article in BMJ public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Using nationally representative data, we investigated differences in loneliness across generations in Japan, focusing on the unique factors affecting adolescents and young adults. Methods: We analysed data from the 2022 and 2023 Basic Survey on Human Connection conducted by the Japanese Government. The dataset included responses from 22 361 individuals aged 16 years and older. Loneliness was assessed using the three-item University of California at Los Angeles Loneliness Scale (UCLA-LS). Multiple linear regression models adjusted for sociodemographic characteristics, social and health-related variables were employed to identify the predictors of loneliness across age groups. Interaction terms between age group and explanatory variables were included to assess whether these associations differed across generations. Results: Adolescents and young adults, as well as middle-aged adults, reported greater loneliness than older adults (mean UCLA-LS scores: 6.80, 6.84 and 6.29, respectively; p<0.001). Significant loneliness predictors included a lack of confidants, poor self-rated overall health, low life satisfaction, anxiety and non-participation in social activities. Interaction analysis demonstrated that the association between poor health and loneliness was significantly stronger in adolescents and young adults than in older adults (β=0.80, 95% CI 0.57 to 1.04; false discovery rate-adjusted p<0.001). In addition, the associations of anxiety and unemployment with loneliness were stronger among working-age populations than among older adults. These findings suggest age-related differences in the factors associated with loneliness. Conclusion: Loneliness among adolescents and young adults appears to be more strongly associated with health vulnerability, whereas psychosocial and economic factors were more strongly associated with loneliness in working-age populations. These findings highlight the importance of developing age-specific strategies to reduce loneliness, particularly among younger individuals experiencing poor health.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.