Article in IEEE transactions on applied superconductivity : a publication of the IEEE Superconductivity Committee, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
2 · The registry
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
5 · Who and what money
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Ian Fogarty FlorangDepartment of Physics, University of Colorado, Boulder CO 80309 USA, and also with the Quantum Sensors Division, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Boulder CO 80305 USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6769-1497
Jonathan William DeanDepartment of Physics, University of Colorado, Boulder CO 80309 USA, and also with the Quantum Sensors Division, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Boulder CO 80305 USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8719-9467
Joseph W FowlerQuantum Sensors Division, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Boulder CO 80305 USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8079-0895
Tom-Erik HaugenRadiation Physics Division, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD 20899 USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8222-116X
Shannon F HoogerheideRadiation Physics Division, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD 20899 USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5243-4586
Daniel JardinRadiation Physics Division, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD 20899 USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5472-4536
H Pieter MummRadiation Physics Division, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD 20899 USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4204-9817
Nathan NakamuraQuantum Sensors Division, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Boulder CO 80305 USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8648-0524
Matthew R NataleDepartment of Physics, University of Colorado, Boulder CO 80309 USA, and also with the Quantum Sensors Division, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Boulder CO 80305 USA.
Galen C O'NeilQuantum Sensors Division, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Boulder CO 80305 USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3450-2263
Nathan J OrtizQuantum Sensors Division, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Boulder CO 80305 USA.
Jeremy PasterRadiation Physics Division, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD 20899 USA.
Thomas M RaoRadiation Physics Division, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD 20899 USA.ORCID 0009-0002-4159-7678
Avirup RoyDepartment of Physics, University of Colorado, Boulder CO 80309 USA, and also with the Quantum Sensors Division, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Boulder CO 80305 USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9156-8851
Daniel S SwetzQuantum Sensors Division, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Boulder CO 80305 USA.
Joel N UllomQuantum Sensors Division, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Boulder CO 80305 USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2486-4025
Michael R VissersQuantum Sensors Division, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Boulder CO 80305 USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2467-7801
Paul SzyprytDepartment of Physics, University of Colorado, Boulder CO 80309 USA, and also with the Quantum Sensors Division, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Boulder CO 80305 USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0184-3419
Funding
Intramural NIST DOC 9999-NIST
6 · The paper itself
Abstract
There are a number of considerations when designing a low-temperature detector for the best possible energy resolution. One that has been particularly challenging for thermal kinetic inductance detectors (TKIDs) is ensuring that the detector's response to deposited energy is constant across the active area of a single pixel. In this article, we directly probe the position-dependent response of our TKID devices at 100-
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.
A Study of the Position-Dependent Response of Thermal Kinetic Inductance Detectors Through the Use of Cryogenic Beam Steering. · full record | OpenQuestion