SynthesisFrontiers in psychiatry2026
Impact of outdoor and nature-based interventions on self-efficacy among adolescents and young adults: a three-level meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Self-efficacy plays a critical role in motivation, emotional regulation, and adaptive functioning, particularly during adolescence and young adulthood. Outdoor and nature-based interventions have been proposed as a promising approach to enhance self-efficacy. However, prior meta-analyses have been limited by the assumption of independent effect sizes, which may not adequately account for multiple outcomes reported within the same study. This study aimed to systematically evaluate the effects of outdoor and nature-based interventions on self-efficacy among adolescents and young adults using a three-level meta-analytic approach. Methods: A systematic literature search was conducted in PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, Cochrane Library, SPORTDiscus, and PsycArticles for studies published up to December 8, 2025. Standardized mean differences (Cohen's d) were calculated using post-intervention means and standard deviations from the intervention and comparison groups. A three-level random-effects meta-analysis was performed to account for statistical dependence among multiple effect sizes. Meta-regression analyses were conducted to examine the potential moderating effects of intervention duration and population type. Results: Six independent studies comprising 10 effect sizes were included, involving 1,356 participants aged 12-24 years. The three-level meta-analysis demonstrated a significant positive effect of outdoor and nature-based interventions on self-efficacy (d = 0.80, 95% CI 0.31 to 1.30, p = 0.005). Meta-regression analyses indicated no significant moderating effects of intervention duration or population type. Conclusion: Outdoor and nature-based interventions were associated with improvements in self-efficacy among adolescents and young adults. No significant moderating effects were observed for age group or intervention duration. These findings suggest that outdoor and nature-based interventions may represent a promising approach for supporting self-efficacy during critical developmental periods. However, the findings should be interpreted cautiously given the small number of available studies and indications of potential small-study effects. Systematic review registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, identifier CRD420261293707.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.