ArticleClinical, cosmetic and investigational dermatology2026
Atypical Genital Herpes Presenting as Chronic Severe Vulvitis: A Case Report.
Article in Clinical, cosmetic and investigational dermatology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Genital herpes is a common sexually transmitted infection, yet its clinical presentation can be highly variable, particularly in immunocompetent individuals. Atypical manifestations often lead to misdiagnosis and delayed treatment. We report a case of a 59‑year‑old female who presented with a six‑month history of vulvar erythema, exudation, increased discharge, pruritus, and pain. She had been repeatedly diagnosed with vulvitis and contact dermatitis, receiving multiple courses of antibiotics, corticosteroids, and antihistamines without sustained improvement. Two vulvar biopsies revealed non‑specific dermatitis with eosinophilic infiltration, and extensive microbiological workup was negative for common pathogens. After hospitalization, localized saline cleansing helped reveal pinpoint erosions on the labia, prompting HSV‑2 DNA testing by polymerase chain reaction (PCR), which confirmed the diagnosis. Serological testing suggested a previous HSV‑2 exposure rather than a primary infection. The patient was treated with valacyclovir, resulting in complete resolution within eight days. This case underscores the importance of considering HSV infection in patients with chronic or recurrent vulvitis, especially when conventional treatments fail. In this instance, saline cleansing served as a simple bedside observation to unmask subtle lesions, though it should not be regarded as a validated diagnostic maneuver without further evidence. Early recognition and targeted antiviral therapy remain essential to prevent prolonged morbidity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.