Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42524276›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of transgender health2026

Focus groups as a tool for enhancing pride and community connectedness among transgender and gender diverse research participants.

Savannah Quach, Paul Kwon

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of transgender health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Savannah QuachUniversity of Nevada, Reno, Reno, Nevada, USA.
Paul KwonUniversity of Nevada, Reno, Reno, Nevada, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Focus groups are a qualitative method of collecting data by engaging a small group of participants in a structured discussion about a specific topic. When research centers on a social issue or a minoritized population, focus groups can serve as a particularly powerful method for data collection by empowering participants and making them a partner in the research process. Focus groups conducted with transgender and gender diverse participants, specifically, have been found to have positive outcomes, such as promoting a sense of belonging and the opportunity to connect with other TGD individuals. Although previous studies have established the potential for focus groups to promote positive outcomes among TGD participants, there is a need for quantitatively testing specific positive outcomes of TGD individuals participating in focus groups. The current study aims to evaluate the effects of focus group participation on a sense of pride and community connectedness among TGD individuals. Method: Focus groups were conducted to explore the construct of gender euphoria and the role of art in eliciting it. The present study is centered around both the qualitative feedback from participants as well as the quantitative results of the pre- and post-focus group surveys. Each participant completed a survey before and after participating in the focus group. Results: Participation in focus groups was found to increase a sense of pride among TGD individuals. In contrast to what was expected, however, focus group participation did not lead to an increase in a sense of community connectedness. Despite this, the qualitative data show that participants did engage in acts of community connectedness, such as resource sharing. Conclusion: These findings highlight the beneficial attributes of focus group methodology.

Indexed as

Community connectednesscommunity engaged participatory researchfocus groupsgender diverseprideresearch methodologytransgender

Identifiers

PMID42524276
PMCPMC13410537

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.