ArticleFrontiers in environmental health2026
Phytoscreening the homes of pregnant residents for volatile organic compounds: a pilot study in metro Detroit.
Article in Frontiers in environmental health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Exposure to anthropogenic volatile organic compounds (VOCs) has been associated with preterm birth, yet the spatial distribution of VOC exposures within urban environments remains poorly characterized, particularly for vapor intrusion pathways. Plants have recently been used as a cost-effective, non-invasive tool to "phytoscreen" for belowground contaminants. Here, we evaluated the use of phytoscreening within a birth cohort in metro Detroit, Michigan, USA by (a) assessing participant willingness to allow sampling in residential front yards, (b) quantifying VOC concentrations across plant tissue types (leaves and twigs), and (c) testing whether VOC detections in plants are associated with proximity to brownfield sites. Of 20 pregnant participants, 18 agreed to phytoscreening and sampling was completed at 13 residences, indicating high feasibility. Across 15 plant species, five of six target VOCs (benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, xylene, trichloroethylene, tetrachloroethylene) were detected. Specifically, toluene was detected at all 13 homes and in 68% of samples. While less common, ethylbenzene was detected in 12 samples across 3 homes and trichloroethylene was detected in one sample that exceeded Michigan's risk-based screening level for soil vapor intrusion. Additionally, VOCs were detected more frequently and at higher concentrations in leaves compared to twigs. However, VOC concentrations in plants were not associated with proximity to known or suspected brownfield sites in this small sample size. Overall, these findings demonstrate the feasibility of phytoscreening in epidemiological studies and highlight its utility for characterizing spatial patterns of VOC exposure. Incorporating plant-based sampling approaches may help identify localized hotspots of human exposure and inform targeted environmental remediation efforts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.