ArticleArchives of internal medicine research2026
Therapeutic Use of Medical Cannabis Beyond Pain Management in Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation.
Article in Archives of internal medicine research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Critical Assessment of Optimal Timing to Initiate Post-Stroke Rehabilitation.Archives of internal medicine research · 2026Article
- Effective Interventions in Restoring Mobility and Relieving Pain After Lower Limb Amputation.Journal of orthopaedics and sports medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Medical cannabis has emerged as a rapidly evolving therapeutic modality with expanding clinical interest beyond its traditional role in pain management. Particularly relevant to Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation (PM&R), where the focus extends beyond symptom control to functional restoration and optimal quality of life, key non-pain indications described in the literature include management of spasticity, neurologic and seizure disorders, sleep disturbances, and chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV). This PM&R-centered narrative review synthesizes current evidence on the efficacy, mechanisms, and clinical implications of cannabis use for non-pain conditions, with emphasis on its interaction with the endocannabinoid system, including CB1- and CB2-receptor-mediated pathways influencing neuromodulation, inflammation, and homeostasis. Across multiple conditions, cannabinoids demonstrate modest benefits in symptom reduction, including improvements in patient-reported spasticity in multiple sclerosis, significant seizure reduction in treatment-resistant pediatric epileptic syndromes, antiemetic effects in refractory CINV, and appetite stimulation in cachectic states. Additionally, subjective improvements in sleep quality have been observed, though objective changes in sleep architecture remain inconsistent. However, there remains limited evidence supporting meaningful improvements in functional outcomes and quality of life. Cannabis use may negatively impact rehabilitation through dose-dependent cognitive impairment, sedation, impaired motor learning, and increased fall risk. Significant challenges persist, including lack of standardized dosing, variability in formulations and THC:CBD ratios, inconsistent product labeling, and limited high-quality randomized controlled trials assessing long-term functional outcomes. Regulatory barriers, including discrepancies between federal and state laws, further complicate clinical implementation and research. This review highlights the gap between symptomatic relief and functional recovery, emphasizing the need for PM&R-specific research focused on rehabilitation-relevant outcomes that objectively measure functional independence and quality of life. Bridging this gap will be critical to defining a role for medical cannabis within rehabilitation medicine and optimizing patient-centered care that maximizes function.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.