ArticleImaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)
Probing the content of semantic representations in body-selective regions.
Article in Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.). The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Recent advances in neural networks trained on natural language have revealed that category-selective regions encode complex semantics and contextual information of natural scenes in addition to object categories. However, the limited interpretability of embeddings derived from these models complicates the characterization of the aspects of natural scenes that contribute to such semantic representations. Here we addressed this question by developing an analysis of the relationship between object co-occurrence in large-scale natural scene captions and corresponding fMRI responses predicted by caption-based encoding models, inspired by the fact that the joint presence of multiple objects generally shapes the overall content of a scene. We performed this analysis on the extrastriate body area (EBA), which responds strongly to human body parts. We found that human bodies co-occurring with sports-related objects drive the strongest predicted responses in the EBA among all image categories, whereas those co-occurring with vehicles or accessories elicit strong but weaker predicted responses. The findings from the co-occurrence analysis helped identify three key body-related features that contribute to the semantic representation in the EBA and fusiform body area: human body motion speed implied in static images of natural scenes is a primary contributor, and the number of people and body size are secondary contributors. Our framework, integrating object co-occurrence with caption-based encoding models, offers an interpretable approach for understanding high-level visual representations underlying natural scene perception.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.