ReviewFrontiers in immunology2026
Context-dependent immune regulation: a mechanistic and AI-enabled integrative framework.
Review in Frontiers in immunology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The immune system functions as a dynamic, multiscale, and context-sensitive network whose outputs depend on cellular composition, spatial organization, metabolic state, host background, and temporal trajectory. These properties have long been investigated through systems immunology, mathematical modeling, and immune simulation. This Perspective uses context dependence as an organizing principle to connect these foundations with recent artificial intelligence (AI) methods, and develops a context-centered view in which immune context is treated as an explicit, partially measurable, and partially uncertain state that can be encoded, constrained, and prospectively tested. It summarizes representative phenomena across cancer, infection, innate immunity, autoimmunity, and genetic variation; describes their microenvironmental, metabolic, systemic, and temporal determinants; and distinguishes the capabilities of mechanistic, data-driven, symbolic, and hybrid models. The proposed hybrid AI-mechanistic framework positions AI as a tool for context representation and multimodal integration, while mechanistic and knowledge-based components preserve explicit dynamics, biological constraints, and testable interventions. Practical strategies are discussed for limited biomaterial, partially longitudinal animal studies, missing or unpaired modalities, interpretability, and prospective validation. The framework does not require every modality in every sample; instead, it emphasizes minimum context annotation, uncertainty-aware integration, explicit assumptions, and benchmarking against simpler models.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.