ArticleJournal of occupational science2025
Changing habits of mind: Seven concrete lessons for aspiring community-based researchers.
Article in Journal of occupational science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
Community-based participatory research (CBPR) principles share foundational elements with occupational justice, including empowerment, self-determination, and meaningful engagement. However, most research follows conventional methods that reinforce expert-novice hierarchies and do not engage participants as equal partners throughout the research process. This may be due, in part, to the fact that transitioning from conventional research to CBPR requires thinking differently about the research process from beginning to end. CBPR often conflicts with conventional research protocols and timelines and necessitates re-framing the roles of participant and researcher. Unfortunately, it is difficult to change habits in any context, including habits of mind, which shape how researchers think and interact. In this article, the author uses a critically reflexive process to describe challenges transitioning from conventional research to CBPR with mental health Clubhouses in Hawai'i and provides seven practical lessons for researchers who aspire to begin using CBPR. These focus broadly on question development, community representation, engaging an internal research team, transparency, capacity, power, and preparedness. Ideally, this work can assist other researchers and practice scholars aspiring to support social transformation through participatory research practices, thereby shifting the status quo.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.