ArticleFrontiers in health services2026
Exploratory pilot study of a virtual support group for stroke caregivers.
Article in Frontiers in health services, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Despite advances in acute stroke care, long-term disability remains prevalent, placing substantial demands on informal caregivers. As structured rehabilitation in the chronic phase of stroke wanes, caregivers face evolving emotional, social, and logistical challenges with limited support, yet accessible and sustainable models of care remain limited. Methods: This implementation-informed exploratory pilot study evaluated the feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary outcomes of a virtual stroke caregiver support group. Results: Five participants attended weekly virtual sessions over six weeks facilitated by healthcare professionals. The virtual format addressed accessibility barriers frequently experienced by caregivers including travel time and distance, money, and caregiving responsibilities. Participants had moderate levels of loneliness and some engagement in self-care activities. Participants reported high satisfaction with and perceived benefits of the intervention, noting improved coping, increased confidence in the caregiving role, and validation for their lived experience as a caregiver. Discussion: The results underscore the need for inclusive, scalable caregiver interventions and greater healthcare provider engagement in caregiver support. Furthermore, the findings of this study support the feasibility and acceptability of a virtual caregiver support group in community-based settings and its potential to promote caregiver well-being.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.