Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42524206›Full record

ArticleImaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)

Bayesian insights into exchange and restriction in gray matter diffusion MRI.

Maëliss Jallais, Quentin Uhl, Tommaso Pavan, Malwina Molendowska, Derek K Jones, Ileana Jelescu, Marco Palombo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.). The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Maëliss JallaisCardiff University Brain Research Imaging Centre (CUBRIC), Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5939-388X
Quentin UhlDepartment of Radiology, Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV), Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9160-4605
Tommaso PavanDepartment of Radiology, Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV), Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3436-6882
Malwina MolendowskaCardiff University Brain Research Imaging Centre (CUBRIC), Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8540-8424
Derek K JonesCardiff University Brain Research Imaging Centre (CUBRIC), Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4409-8049
Ileana JelescuDepartment of Radiology, Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV), Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3664-0195
Marco PalomboCardiff University Brain Research Imaging Centre (CUBRIC), Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4892-7967

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biophysical models in diffusion MRI (dMRI) hold promise for characterizing gray matter tissue microstructure. Yet, the reliability of their parameter estimates remains largely under studied, especially in models that incorporate water exchange. In this study, we investigate the accuracy, precision, and presence of degeneracy of two recently proposed gray matter models, NEXI and SANDIX, using established acquisition protocols, on both simulated and

Indexed as

Bayesian inferencedegeneracydiffusion MRIgray matteruncertaintywater exchange

Identifiers

PMID42524206
PMCPMC13409282

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.