Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42524200›Full record

ArticleCurrent challenges in thoracic surgery2023

Opportunities and Challenges in Lung Cancer Screening Implementation: A Narrative Review.

Eduardo R Nunez, Katrina A Steiling, Virginia R Litle

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current challenges in thoracic surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Eduardo R NunezThe Pulmonary Center, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA.
Katrina A SteilingThe Pulmonary Center, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA.
Virginia R LitleDivision of Thoracic Surgery, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA.

Funding

BIOLOGY OF THE LUNG--MULTIDISCIPLINARY PROGRAMT32HL007035 · NHLBI · BOSTON UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CAMPUS · PI Darrell N. Kotton, JOSEPH P MIZGERD · 1985 to 2026
$24.3M
NHLBI NIH HHS T32 HL007035
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The U.S. Preventive Services Task Force and the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services recommend lung cancer screening for high-risk current and former smokers. Developing a comprehensive lung cancer screening (LCS) requires coordinated planning from program conception through implementation and maintenance that address both pragmatic and regulatory matters. In this review article, we discuss the available evidence, guideline recommendations, and practical considerations for implementing a high-quality lung cancer screening program. Key factors include engagement of stakeholders with a particular focus on support from providers, patients and healthcare organizations, consideration of the infrastructure and program design that will best serve local needs, and implementation of mandatory components such as a data registry and smoking cessation. We also review other recommended components that contribute to maintaining a high-quality screening program such as a clinical screening coordinator, patient navigator, and tools to improve the uptake of and adherence to lung cancer screening.

Indexed as

implementationlung cancerLung cancer screening

Identifiers

PMID42524200
PMCPMC13410345

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.