ArticleJCEM case reports2026
Diagnostic puzzles in primary amenorrhea: a report of 3 cases.
Article in JCEM case reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Primary amenorrhea is a common referral indication in pediatric and adolescent endocrinology and can occur due to hypothalamic-pituitary disorders, uterovaginal anatomical anomalies, or gonadal dysfunction. We describe 3 adolescents presenting with primary amenorrhea and otherwise appropriate pubertal development, due to Mayer-Rokitansky-Kuster-Hauser syndrome, each illustrating a distinct diagnostic challenge. The patient in case 1, who also had concerns of short stature, had elevated gonadotropin levels, suggesting a possibility of primary ovarian insufficiency. However, a normal estradiol level and repeat gonadotropin testing clarified the underlying hormonal physiology. The patient in case 2 presented with bilateral inguinal swellings and primary amenorrhea mimicking androgen insensitivity, but imaging demonstrated ectopic ovaries with absent Müllerian structures. The patient in case 3 had primary amenorrhea and a large lumbosacral mass with neurological symptoms, due to a lipomeningomyelocele associated with Müllerian agenesis. A structured evaluation incorporating repeat hormonal assessment and detailed imaging clarified the diagnosis in all cases. This report highlights the common diagnostic pitfalls during evaluation for primary amenorrhea and emphasizes the importance of reviewing the biochemical data in the context of clinical and imaging findings. In addition, a retrospective review of our cohort of adolescent girls with similar presentations is elaborated to highlight the range of associated findings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.