ReviewCureus2026
Differentiating Sporadic and Familial Adenomatous Polyposis-Associated Congenital Hypertrophy of the Retinal Pigment Epithelium From Congenital Grouped Pigmentation: A Review of Morphologic, Histopathologic, and Multimodal Imaging.
Review in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Congenital hypertrophy of the retinal pigment epithelium (CHRPE) occurs both as a sporadic finding and as an extraintestinal manifestation of familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP). Congenital grouped pigmentation (CGP, "bear tracks") represents a third distinct entity that may be confused with FAP-associated lesions. Accurate differentiation among these three entities has important clinical implications for appropriate surveillance, counseling, and patient management. Although prior reviews have synthesized the morphologic, histopathologic, and multimodal imaging features of pigmented retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) lesions, subsequent multimodal imaging studies and evolving evidence have refined the distinctions among FAP-associated lesions, sporadic solitary CHRPE, and CGP. This narrative review provides an updated synthesis on the clinical, fundoscopic, optical coherence tomography (OCT), fundus autofluorescence (FAF), OCT angiography (OCTA), and histopathologic features of FAP-associated CHRPE, sporadic solitary CHRPE, and CGP. Key differentiating features of FAP-associated lesions include multiplicity, bilaterality, absence of lacunae, absence of cystoid edema, and presence of pigment epithelial detachments (PEDs). CGP is distinguished by its wedge-shaped (sectorial) distribution pattern, preserved outer retinal architecture on OCT, and retention of normal ellipsoidal pigment granule morphology on histopathology. An evidence-based diagnostic feature comparison framework is proposed to assist clinicians in determining which patients with pigmented RPE lesions warrant genetic evaluation for FAP.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.