SynthesisFrontiers in dental medicine2026
Applications of artificial intelligence in endodontic education: a systematic review.
Synthesis in Frontiers in dental medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The growing bases of Artificial Intelligence (AI) applications ranging from diagnostic support to immersive training have rapidly advanced in the dental education field. Endodontics, by its very nature of relying so highly on a proper diagnosis and careful technical execution, is an indication through which AI may be best poised to succeed the most in specialty care. Objective: The aim of this systematic review was to assess the role of artificial intelligence (AI): machine learning (ML), deep learning (DL), virtual/augmented reality (VR/AR) and large language models (LLMs) related to endodontic education based on available evidence published until September 2025. Methods: This review was performed in accordance with the PRISMA 2020 guidelines. Publication databases were reviewed included PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science and Cochrane. Inclusion Criteria: Studies that evaluated any form of AI for didactic, preclinical or clinical education in endodontics and/or patient-centered education were included. Study characteristics, AI domains, applications and outcomes were extracted. Risk of bias and methodological quality were evaluated according to study design using RoB 2, ROBINS-I, AXIS, and AMSTAR-2 tools. Results: Fifteen studies were included. Radiographic interpretation augmented by AI improved sensitivity and specificity to reduce false positive reporting especially for junior clinicians. In preclinical training, VR/AR simulations have shown to improve psychomotor skills, confidence and knowledge acquisition. LLMs can be useful in producing exam questions and case-based Q&A, although the accuracy and discriminatory ability varied. AI mediated Patient education interventions led to anxiety reduction and comprehension. There was heterogeneity of outcome measures, dataset bias; reliability and transparency issues. Conclusion: AI holds promise for use in diagnostic, didactic and preclinical endodontic education. They must be safely implemented in a controlled format, under the supervision of faculty and with objective evaluation metrics in place. Clinical significance: AI provides quantifiable benefits in endodontic education by improving accuracy of diagnosis, assisting decision-making and facilitating dental students training using VR/AR simulation. Some interventions using AI in curricula may allow the student to acquire skills faster, feel more confident, and transfer these benefits to improved patient communication. But we need to make sure our integration is backed up with faculty monitoring, transparent AI models and rigorous validation before putting it in any production environment or relying on it too heavily for exam outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.