ArticleActa Cardiologica Sinica2026
Improved Anticoagulation Guideline Adherence and Clinical Outcome Through Hospital-Wide Atrial Fibrillation Alarming System.
Article in Acta Cardiologica Sinica, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Direct oral anticoagulation (DOAC) therapy has been approved for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation (AF) patients. However, about 30% of patients with AF are not on oral anticoagulants (OACs). About 30% of patients on OACs are on off-label dosages. Objective: We used a hospital-wide AF screening system to improve the OAC guideline adherence rate. We also assessed the impact on clinical outcomes. Methods: All electrocardiograms (ECGs) of each hospitalized patient were screened using an AF screening system, regardless of whether the ECGs were obtained during or before hospitalization. Patients with AF were enrolled. The CHA Results: At baseline, the DOAC guideline adherence rate was only 40.6%. After the intervention, the guideline adherence rate increased to 82.5%. After discharge, the adherence rate did not decrease. The annual stroke rates for patients on guideline-recommended DOACs with and without our intervention were 2.79% and 3.12%, respectively. The annual stroke rate for patients on DOACs not adhering to the guidelines was 9.91%. The minor bleeding rate was significantly higher in the groups that adhered to the guidelines, but the major bleeding rate was not significantly different. Conclusions: Implementation of a hospital-wide AF screening system improved the DOAC guideline adherence rate and reduced the annual stroke rate for patients with AF. The minor bleeding rate was increased.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.