ArticleTrauma surgery & acute care open2026
Building an emergency general surgery registry to track and benchmark outcomes.
Article in Trauma surgery & acute care open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Emergency general surgery (EGS) represents a significant portion of admissions to hospitals and overall surgical care delivery, yet comprehensive outcome tracking and quality improvement efforts have lagged behind elective surgery and trauma care. This article outlines the gap in data and provides three practical solutions to registry development: third-party registry software with dedicated registrars, leveraging existing National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) infrastructure through the EGS-NSQIP module, and automated data extraction from electronic medical records. Each approach offers unique advantages in addressing the dual challenges of case identification and risk-adjusted outcome measurement for both local quality improvement and national benchmarking. The aim of this white paper is to provide pragmatic, scalable data solutions for EGS leaders seeking to implement contemporary quality improvement and verification efforts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.