ReviewExperimental and therapeutic medicine2026
Ubiquitin-driven regulation of immune checkpoints in lung cancer: Mechanisms and therapeutic implications (Review).
Review in Experimental and therapeutic medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The ubiquitin-proteasome system is a master regulator of anti-tumor immunity in lung cancer, which primarily functions through controlling the stability of immune checkpoint proteins. The present review offers a synthesis concerning how a dynamic balance between E3 ubiquitin ligases (E3s) and deubiquitinases (DUBs) dictates the fate of key checkpoint proteins, including programmed cell death protein 1/programmed death-ligand 1, lymphocyte-activating gene 3 and B7 homolog 4. Although specific E3s are known to promote checkpoint degradation to enhance T-cell function in certain contexts, and DUBs frequently stabilize these proteins to foster immune evasion, these effects are context-dependent; for example, certain E3s are paradoxically able to promote immune evasion, whereas the inhibition of select DUBs synergizes with immune checkpoint blockade. This regulatory interplay extends to core oncogenic pathways, including the phosphoinositide 3-kinase/AKT and mitogen-activated protein kinase signaling pathways, which indirectly modulate checkpoint expression. Therapeutically, targeting these enzymes with various agents, such as the ubiquitin-specific peptidase 7 inhibitor P5091 or the repurposed drug canagliflozin, has the effect of synergizing with immune checkpoint blockade through reshaping the tumor microenvironment. However, clinical translation is challenged by tumor heterogeneity, pathway redundancy and the complexity of the ubiquitin network. Future progress in this area hinges on precision drug design, predictive biomarker development and rational combination therapies that are informed by a deeper mechanistic understanding of ubiquitin-driven immune regulation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.