ArticleAdvanced pharmaceutical bulletin2026
Hidden Hazards: Blood Lead and Cadmium Levels Associated with Biochemical and Hematological Markers.
Article in Advanced pharmaceutical bulletin, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Workers occupationally exposed to fuel vapors are at risk of contamination by heavy metals such as lead and cadmium. This study aimed to quantify blood levels of lead and cadmium and evaluate associated biochemical, hormonal, and oxidative stress alterations among fuel station workers. Methods: This cross-sectional study recruited 66 healthy males, comprising 33 workers with at least 2 years of direct fuel exposure and 33 non-exposed controls. Blood lead and cadmium were quantified using Flame Atomic Absorption Spectrophotometry (AAS). Biochemical markers, reproductive hormones, and oxidative stress indicators were analyzed. Statistical analyses were performed using independent t-tests to identify significant differences between groups, and Pearson's correlation test to assess associations. Results: Mean blood lead (43.4±5.4 µg/dL vs. 23.6±1.6 µg/dL; Conclusion: Occupational exposure to lead and cadmium suggests adverse hepatic, renal, hormonal, and oxidative stress changes among fuel station workers. Regular monitoring of biochemical and hormonal markers is strongly recommended, along with preventive exposure-control measures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.