SynthesisFrontiers in psychology2026
Efficacy of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation combined with cognitive behavioral therapy for depression: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) and cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) are established treatments for depression. However, the incremental benefit of combining these approaches remains uncertain, partly because prior reviews have pooled studies with clinically heterogeneous comparator conditions. This study systematically reviewed the efficacy of rTMS combined with CBT for depression and conducted a meta-analysis restricted to trials using rTMS-based control conditions. Methods: We systematically searched Web of Science, PubMed, Embase, EBSCOhost, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Wanfang Data, VIP Database, and PsyArXiv from inception to 1 December 2025. Randomized controlled trials enrolling patients with depression and evaluating rTMS combined with CBT-spectrum interventions were eligible. Comparator conditions were stratified into rTMS controls, medication-based CBT controls, and medication controls. All eligible studies were included in the qualitative synthesis, whereas the quantitative synthesis was limited to studies comparing the combined intervention with rTMS controls. Standardized mean differences (Hedges' g) were estimated using a random-effects model. Results: Ten randomized controlled trials involving 1,320 participants met the inclusion criteria. Qualitative synthesis suggested that the combined intervention may have advantages over both medication-based CBT controls and medication controls. Seven trials comparing the combined intervention with rTMS controls were included in the meta-analysis. The pooled analysis showed a small-to-moderate benefit of the combined intervention over rTMS control for reducing depressive symptoms (Hedges' Conclusion: Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation combined with CBT appears to provide additional benefit for the treatment of depression. Meta-analytic evidence supports greater symptom improvement relative to rTMS controls, and qualitative evidence suggests possible advantages over medication-based CBT controls and medication controls. These findings provide systematic support for the clinical potential of combining neuromodulation with psychotherapy while highlighting the need for larger, higher-quality trials with standardized protocols and longer follow-up. Systematic review registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD420251267093, PROSPERO: CRD420251267093.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.