ArticleDEN open2027
Benefit of Linked-Color Imaging in Artificial Intelligence-Assisted Diagnosis of Early Gastric Cancer: A Pilot Study With Propensity Score Adjustment.
Article in DEN open, 2027. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Aims: Artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted endoscopy represents a promising approach for lesion detection, yet frequent false-positive detections impair clinical utility by disrupting examinations and diminishing physician confidence. Linked-color imaging (LCI), an image-enhanced endoscopy technique that amplifies mucosal and vascular contrast, may address this limitation. This investigation evaluated whether LCI reduces false-positive AI detections compared with white-light imaging (WLI). Methods: This retrospective study analyzed consecutive AI-assisted upper endoscopies performed between March 2024 and June 2025. WLI and LCI were performed sequentially within the same endoscopic session in each patient. False-positive AI detections were compared between modalities using two computer-aided detection (CAD) versions. Propensity score adjustment was used as a sensitivity analysis for baseline differences between CAD Versions I and II. Results: Of 66 initially screened cases, 63 remained after excluding patients with prior gastric surgery. LCI reduced false-positive AI detections compared with WLI (median 2 vs. 5; Conclusions: LCI assessment performed after WLI observation yielded fewer false-positive CAD-EYE detections while maintaining lesion detection sensitivity. However, because the observation sequence was fixed, these findings should be interpreted cautiously and require confirmation in prospective or counterbalanced studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.