Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42524022›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of clinical pediatric dentistry2026

Efficacy of Different Pediatric Local Anesthesia Delivery Techniques in Reducing Pain and Anxiety: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

M Lavanya Mangala Valli, A R Senthil Eagappan, B Asvitha, S Nandini, T Subakeerthi, Priya Kannan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of clinical pediatric dentistry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

M Lavanya Mangala ValliDepartment of Pediatric and Preventive Dentistry, Chettinad Dental College and Research Institute, Kelambakkam, Tamil Nadu, India.
A R Senthil EagappanDepartment of Pediatric and Preventive Dentistry, Chettinad Dental College and Research Institute, Kelambakkam, Tamil Nadu, India.
B AsvithaDepartment of Pediatric and Preventive Dentistry, Chettinad Dental College and Research Institute, Kelambakkam, Tamil Nadu, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-1983-1501
S NandiniDepartment of Pediatric and Preventive Dentistry, Chettinad Dental College and Research Institute, Kelambakkam, Tamil Nadu, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-6494-297X
T SubakeerthiDepartment of Pediatric and Preventive Dentistry, Chettinad Dental College and Research Institute, Kelambakkam, Tamil Nadu, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-7241-352X
Priya KannanDepartment of Pediatric and Preventive Dentistry, Chettinad Dental College and Research Institute, Kelambakkam, Tamil Nadu, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-8683-7040

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Pain and anxiety during local anesthesia (LA) administration are major concerns in pediatric dentistry, as they greatly influence a child's participation during dental treatment. The purpose of this research was aimed at assessing and comparing the effectiveness of three different techniques for delivering LA-namely the conventional syringe, Woodpecker StarPen, and Buzzy® system-in alleviating pain and anxiety associated with inferior alveolar nerve block (IANB) administration in children aged 6-10 years. Methods: A randomized clinical trial was carried out on 120 healthy children aged 6-10 years who needed an IANB. Participants were randomly allotted into three groups ( Results: In all three groups, HR, subjective pain perception [Wong-Baker FACES Pain Scale (WBFPS)], and behavioral responses (FLACC) scores increased during LA administration and declined postadministration. The Buzzy® group demonstrated significantly lower HR, WBFPS, and FLACC scores compared with the conventional syringe and StarPen groups, indicating superior control of pain and anxiety. The StarPen group showed moderate improvement over the conventional technique but was less effective than the Buzzy® system. Conclusion: The Buzzy® system proved to be the most efficient in reducing pain and anxiety during administration of LA in children, followed by the StarPen and conventional syringe. It may be considered a valuable tool for improving patient comfort in pediatric dental settings.

Indexed as

Buzzy systemChildrenComputer controlled local anesthesia delivery systemDental anxietyPain perception

Identifiers

PMID42524022
PMCPMC13408505

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.