Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42524019›Full record

ReviewJournal of medical education and curricular development

Teaching Procedural Skills: A Structured, Evidence-Informed Framework for Clinician-Educators Across Resource Settings.

Nkechi Oluwakemi Dike

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of medical education and curricular development. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Nkechi Oluwakemi DikeSchool of Medical Sciences, University of Cape Coast, Cape Coast, Ghana.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4129-0430

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Procedural competence is central to safe clinical practice, yet the teaching of procedural skills remains largely unstructured in most clinical environments. Most clinicians are trained to perform procedures, not to teach them, and many rely on informal apprenticeship models that inadequately account for how novices acquire complex skills. This paper proposes the Structured Procedural Mastery (SPM) Framework, a practical, evidence-informed approach to teaching procedural skills grounded in cognitive load theory, deliberate practice, motor learning science, and stage-based models of skill acquisition. Organized around three teaching phases - preparing to teach, teaching with deliberate progression, and consolidating learning - the framework provides a step-by-step pathway applicable to any clinical procedure, from straightforward to complex, and adaptable across resource settings. Simulation is addressed not as a technology requirement but as a structured practice environment accessible in both well-resourced and resource-limited contexts. Practical tools for faculty are included as appendices. The SPM Framework aims to give clinician-educators a clear, evidence-informed structure for translating procedural expertise into effective teaching, with particular relevance for clinical training environments in sub-Saharan Africa and other low- and middle-income country (LMIC) settings where faculty development resources are constrained.

Indexed as

clinical educationdeliberate practicefaculty developmentlow- and middle-income countriesmedical educationprocedural skills teachingsimulationskill acquisitionSub-Saharan Africa

Identifiers

PMID42524019
PMCPMC13408071

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.