ReviewAdvanced pharmaceutical bulletin2026
Clinical Studies Using Intranasal Therapies for Parkinson's Disease: A Review.
Review in Advanced pharmaceutical bulletin, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Intranasal delivery is a method of administering medications through the nasal cavity. It offers several advantages, such as rapid absorption, bypassing first-pass metabolism, direct nose-to-brain transport and localized effects. These benefits make it a promising approach for drug delivery in Parkinson's disease, a progressive neurological disorder characterized by the degeneration of nerve cells in the brain. This review evaluates the efficacy and safety of intranasal delivery for Parkinson's disease treatment. Several studies on intranasal apomorphine reported rapid clinical response, improved UPDRS motor scores, tapping scores, and median Webster's scores, suggesting its effectiveness as a rescue therapy during "off" states. Intranasal recombinant erythropoietin was well tolerated and showed cognitive benefits. intranasal glutathione was safe and showed better bioavailability. Intranasal insulin improved cognitive performance without hypoglycemia, indicating a localized effect. Intranasal cholecystokinin and ipratropium bromide did not show significant benefits. Intranasal desmopressin is a safe and effective medication for nocturnal polyuria in Parkinson disease. Intranasal transplantation of neural stem cells is safe and is associated with functional improvement. Finally, Rivastigmine nasal spray offered better bioavailability and fewer side effects compared with conventional forms. The most common adverse effect was mild transient nasal or throat irritation. This review highlights the potential applications, efficacy, and side effects of various intranasal medications for Parkinson's disease and proposes using new interventions for future studies. The general benefits of nasal administration for Parkinson's disease treatment include localized effects, fewer side effects, faster onset of action, improved bioavailability, and enhanced therapeutic effectiveness.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.